Season 4 is calling me, but I can’t start watching it until I am done with the 2nd and 3rd season. As I am writing this, I am almost done with the 3rd season, so I am hoping that that review will come out quickly after this one, but I am also really pushing to start watching the 4th season because that is why I am doing all of this.
Now if you haven’t seen Season 1, I’m not totally sure why
you are reading this review. This is your warning because the only way to
really give a review of the second season is to talk about events that happened
in the first season. This is your SPOILER
ALERT.
When we last left Frank Underwood (played by Kevin Spacey)
in Season 1, he caused the death of Peter Russo (played by Corey Stoll) and
manipulated the Vice President to step down so he could come in and take his
place. One of the last scenes of the 1st season is the President
(played by Michel Gil) offering Frank the position of Vice President. It of course seems like Frank is surprised to have been offered a position out of the blue, but this has been his plan all along and it had finally come to fruition. However,
one of the last scenes is also Zoe Barnes (played by Kate Mara) and her other
reporter friends, gathering evidence, and getting closer and closer to the
truth of how Frank manipulated his way to the Vice Presidency, and possibly
uncovering some illegal involvement with the death of Congressman Russo.
Season 2 centers on Frank as the Vice President of the
United States. Now having not knowing too much about what could happen in this
season, I wasn’t totally sure how this could really be as interesting as the
first season. The Vice President is an important office in the executive branch
but it definitely has its limitations. However, this only helps the progression
of this story because it focuses Frank on the ultimate prize. And if you don’t
know what that ultimate prize is, you obviously don’t know that much about
Frank Underwood or House of Cards.
Along the way, Frank encounters some new characters that
either help or block his path towards power, or they do both. Some of these
characters are new, some of them are old. Some of the new ones include Raymond
Tusk (played by Gerald McRaney) an influential business man and confidant of
the President. There becomes a war of influence between Frank and Raymond and
I’ll say, it gets really, really good. Then there’s Jacqueline Sharp (played by
Molly Parker) who Frank picks as his successor as Whip in the Senate. Molly
Parker quickly becomes one of my favorite characters and that continues on into
the 3rd season.
Then there are characters we knew from the first season who
try and get in Frank’s way, like the reporter and friend of Zoe Barnes Lucas
Goodwin (played by Sebastian Arcelus) who continues to dig into the evidence
against Underwood with Zoe. Mahershala Ali returns as Remy Danton who is now
working for Raymond Tusk and he plays an intricate role in this season.
Frank has his allies as well including his wife. Claire
(played by Robin Wright) has a huge role in this season as she begins to act
like the Second Lady and you can definitely tell she has her own ambitions and
her own goals. She has a huge role in this season as her past comes to light
and she enters the public eye more if not just as much as Frank.
Michael Kelly returns as Frank’s Chief of Staff, Doug
Stamper. Doug’s role is made interesting in this season as Frank and Claire
bring on a new communications director in Seth Grayon (played by Derek Cecil) Competition begins to
brew between the two of them and needless to say, it just gets good all around.
Doug is still dealing with some of the loose ends from the 1st
season and that includes the prostitute they used in the downfall of Peter
Russo, Rachel Posner (played by Rachel Brosnahan). She returns and they delve
into her life a little bit more. While I wouldn’t say she’s the most
interesting character in the entire season, I was still interested in her story
and the struggles she is going through. The relationship between her and Doug
continues to evolve and I thought it was really well done.
The cool thing about season two is when the show starts to
become politically relevant. The first season as focused heavily on the
characters and their development. We needed to know who Frank Underwood was, we
needed to know who the people around him were, especially those who carried
onto the 2nd season. There were political issues that came up for
sure, but they were pretty low key and local issues. The focus of the first
season was more on introductions and laying the groundwork for the future.
Season 2 starts to focus on policy because Frank’s scope has
expanded. The show starts ripping political situations right from headlines and
putting their own spin on it. Frank deals with the Tea Party and the
immobilization of Congress, as well as government shutdowns.
Now there is still the conniving massing of power from the
first season in the second and that’s why I think season 2 works a lot better
than season 3. I’ll talk more about that in my review of the third season, but
the important thing to know is that there is a great balance between power
plays and dirty schemes between characters, and actual politics and policies
going on in the country. Season 2 evolves the character of Frank Underwood
because in the first season, everything he was doing seemed to be just for himself.
In the second season, his priorities are still on his massing of power, but
that rides in tandem with the needs of the country. So in many ways, Frank ends
up being the good guy by accident, only because it’s the best thing for the
country. It’s like the right thing is being done, but in the wrong way and by a
person we know is just down right evil. It really makes you feel weird about
who you are rooting for and who you are not.
But I think probably the strongest portion of the show is
seeing the influence Frank has over the President. From the very beginning, you
see a tug of war for the president between him and Raymond Tusk. The more the
show goes on, you see Frank begin to get the other hand and the President sees
him as a trusted companion and friend. And that’s where things get sad because
you start to get to know the President better than we did in the first season
and you know that all of this is just Frank’s power play. On top of that, you
know how things usually end when Frank Underwood gets close to somebody,
especially someone you learn to be a genuinely good person. Its different from
Frank’s relationship with Peter Russo because you couldn’t really see the
entire plan until you saw it in front of you, and at that point it was too late
for Peter. The difference is, you could guess Frank’s goals in courting the
President and you know that it probably isn’t going to end well for Garrett
Walker.
As I mentioned, Claire becomes an intricate part in that
manipulation, especially with her relationship with the First Lady.
There are just so many good parts about the second season
that I can’t really decide which one I like more. I think I probably like the
second season more because of the new additions like Molly Parker, and other
characters, and the shared focus on a bigger policy picture that builds on the
scheming and great political intrigue that was built on by the first season.
As far as complaints go, I will bring up the same issues
someone might find in the first season. This is a very dry show. It’s a lot of
dialogue, it’s a lot of drama, and very little real action. It’s more than
likely that if you’re tired, this show might put you to sleep and you’ll have
to rewind to catch up on all the drama that enfolded while you were lulled to sleep
by Frank Underwood’s southern drawl.
On top of it all, this season is just as heavy, if not more
than the first one. If you don’t like rooting for the conniving and just down
right ruthless people, House of Cards might not be your thing. But I think if
you’ve made it this far, you probably enjoy that kind of thing, you sicko.
But if you like the first season, you’re going to really
love the second season. I don’t think they lose their stride at all and the
ante is only raised in the second season. I of course will talk about that
trajectory when it comes to the third season, but for now, I think the second
season of House of Cards takes what was built in the first season and only
improves it.
As you can see, I’m getting better at reviewing full seasons,
but it’s a lot easier when the season seems more like a mini-series/mini movie
rather than a full season of TV and it’s a little bit easier to digest. But
what do you think about the second season of House of Cards. Do you think it
was better or worse than the first season? Comment and Discuss below! You can
also send me your thoughts on Twitter @cmhaugen24 as well as send me your
requests for movies and TV shows I should review in the future. If you follow
me on Twitter, you can get updates on future movie news and reviews coming out
of this blog.
No comments:
Post a Comment